We recently co-authored an article for Compliance Week on best practices for responding to government investigations.

The starting point is in fact prior to the investigation, with implementation of a compliance program that is able to help an organization both prevent and detect violations of the law or company policies. Among other things, the compliance program should include a clear process for investigating and remediating violations.

We emphasized the importance of being able to address multiple issues as part of the investigation, including: (1) understanding allegations and relevant laws; (2) anticipating and preparing for civil lawsuits; (3) following governance standards; (4) communicating audit-firm requirements; and (5) developing remediation efforts in concert with the fact-finding process.

We also recommend, in the case of a government investigation, maintaining frequent communication to build trust and thereby retain autonomy of the investigation.

“No two government investigations are the same,” we explained in the article. “Yet there are steps that should always be followed to maximize the chance that the investigation will satisfy legal obligations, respond to allegations of misconduct, and promote a culture of compliance.”

The full article, “Best practices for responding to government investigations,” was published January 29 and is available online.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Thad McBride Thad McBride

Thad McBride advises public and private companies on the legal considerations essential to successful business operations in a global marketplace. He focuses his practice on counseling clients on compliance with U.S. export regulations (ITAR and EAR), economic sanctions and embargoes, import controls (CBP)…

Thad McBride advises public and private companies on the legal considerations essential to successful business operations in a global marketplace. He focuses his practice on counseling clients on compliance with U.S. export regulations (ITAR and EAR), economic sanctions and embargoes, import controls (CBP), and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). He also advises clients on anti-boycott controls, and assists companies with matters involving the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Thad supports international companies across a range of industries, including aviation, automotive, defense, energy, financial services, manufacturing, medical devices, oilfield services, professional services, research and development, retail, and technology. Beyond advising on day-to-day compliance matters, Thad regularly assists clients in investigations and enforcement actions brought by government agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the U.S. Treasury Department Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the U.S. State Department Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the U.S. Commerce Department Bureau of Industry & Security (BIS), and the Securities & Exchange Commission.

Photo of James Parkinson James Parkinson

Jamie Parkinson focuses his practice on counseling businesses and individuals in regulatory compliance and government investigations, with an emphasis on multi-jurisdictional and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) matters. A member of the firm’s Compliance & Government Investigations group, Jamie  has significant experience navigating…

Jamie Parkinson focuses his practice on counseling businesses and individuals in regulatory compliance and government investigations, with an emphasis on multi-jurisdictional and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) matters. A member of the firm’s Compliance & Government Investigations group, Jamie  has significant experience navigating cross-border matters and representing clients in criminal and civil enforcement actions involving the FCPA, extradition, securities fraud, insider trading, false statements and environmental issues.