Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR)

On May 7, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) dismissed a protest challenging the terms of a solicitation for being unduly restrictive. The protest highlights three important considerations that contractors should understand when deciding to file a protest:Continue Reading Bid Protest Minute – Protest Underscores Importance of Prejudice, Past Performance Requirements, and Protest Timing

One of President Trump’s campaign themes was ending diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI) programs, and he moved quickly to address those campaign promises. Within days of his inauguration, the president issued two executive orders (EOs) overhauling how the federal government views programs seeking to advance DEI priorities.Continue Reading Implementation of Trump DEI Orders Slower than Expected: What Contractors Should Know

Through a duo of Executive Orders (EOs), issued on April 15 and 16 respectively, President Trump announced “a first-of-its-kind overhaul of Federal procurement policy.” The rewrite represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity to make an incredibly complex system more efficient and user friendly. With that said, while the president positions the changes as an effort of “increase[ing] competition and efficiency while decreasing costs,” the devil is in the details. Below we discuss areas of emphasis for the Trump administration, the short-term implications of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) rewrite, and explore important considerations that could inform what the final version of “FAR 2.0” looks like.Continue Reading White House Announces “Revolutionary FAR Overhaul”: What to Know

On March 14, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the  Fourth Circuit granted the government’s motion for a stay pending appeal, terminating a Maryland district court’s injunction of certain elements of President Trump’s January 20 and 21 diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) executive orders (EO), “Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing” and “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity.”  We wrote about the district court’s injunction here and here.Continue Reading Fourth Circuit Terminates Maryland District Court’s DEI Injunction

Following U.S. General Services Administration’s (GSA) lead, which we wrote about here, on March 4, the Department of Defense (DoD) issued a Class Deviation—Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity in Federal Contracts—directing DoD Contracting Officers (COs) to “remove, replace, and not enforce Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) solicitation provisions and contract clauses associated with Executive Order (EO) 11246, Equal Employment Opportunity.”Continue Reading Department of Defense Issues Affirmative Action Class Deviation

As the Trump administration continues to eliminate federal positions and reduce contract and grant outlays, many private companies will likely be eyeing current and former government employees for employment over the coming months.  However, companies looking to hire former government employees must keep in mind the strict and nuanced rules that govern their hiring, and, in some cases, prohibit contractors from paying former government employees and limit their ability to appear before their former agencies. Continue Reading Ethics Rules Applicable to Hiring Former Federal Government Employees

A new executive order is set to reshape federal contracting by implementing more stringent transparency measures, but it may also create significant challenges for both government agencies and contractors.Continue Reading Executive Order on Federal Contracting Transparency: Potential Challenges and Implications

On March 3 Judge Abelson of the U.S. District Court for the District or Maryland denied the government’s motion for a stay pending appeal of the preliminary injunction halting the termination of equity-related federal grants and contracts and stopping the imposition of new diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)-related certification requirements in federal agreements, among other actions required by President Trump’s DEI-related Executive Orders 14151 and 14173Continue Reading Judge Denies Government’s Motion to Stay Injunction of Anti-DEI Executive Orders

Over the first month of the new administration, President Trump has directed the review or termination of certain types of contracts and grants, including equity-related agreements, awards under the Inflation Reduction Act and the Investment and Jobs Act, and foreign aid agreements awarded by USAID.  Those actions, while disruptive, have been limited to certain agreement types or agencies. Continue Reading Executive Order Directs Systematic Review of “Covered Contracts and Grants” For Possible Termination

On February 24, Judge Armando Bonilla of the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) declined to dismiss a challenge to a $648 million award under a Missile Defense Agency (MDA) development deal, finding that the court had jurisdiction to review Other Transaction (OT) Authorities like the one at issue. For years, unsuccessful offerors have found it difficult to challenge OT award (OTA) decisions because both the GAO and COFC have found they have limited jurisdiction over these types of agreements.Continue Reading COFC Decision Significantly Broadens OTA Bid Protest Jurisdiction