Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR)

Following U.S. General Services Administration’s (GSA) lead, which we wrote about here, on March 4, the Department of Defense (DoD) issued a Class Deviation—Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity in Federal Contracts—directing DoD Contracting Officers (COs) to “remove, replace, and not enforce Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) solicitation provisions and contract clauses associated with Executive Order (EO) 11246, Equal Employment Opportunity.”Continue Reading Department of Defense Issues Affirmative Action Class Deviation

As the Trump administration continues to eliminate federal positions and reduce contract and grant outlays, many private companies will likely be eyeing current and former government employees for employment over the coming months.  However, companies looking to hire former government employees must keep in mind the strict and nuanced rules that govern their hiring, and, in some cases, prohibit contractors from paying former government employees and limit their ability to appear before their former agencies. Continue Reading Ethics Rules Applicable to Hiring Former Federal Government Employees

A new executive order is set to reshape federal contracting by implementing more stringent transparency measures, but it may also create significant challenges for both government agencies and contractors.Continue Reading Executive Order on Federal Contracting Transparency: Potential Challenges and Implications

On March 3 Judge Abelson of the U.S. District Court for the District or Maryland denied the government’s motion for a stay pending appeal of the preliminary injunction halting the termination of equity-related federal grants and contracts and stopping the imposition of new diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)-related certification requirements in federal agreements, among other actions required by President Trump’s DEI-related Executive Orders 14151 and 14173Continue Reading Judge Denies Government’s Motion to Stay Injunction of Anti-DEI Executive Orders

Over the first month of the new administration, President Trump has directed the review or termination of certain types of contracts and grants, including equity-related agreements, awards under the Inflation Reduction Act and the Investment and Jobs Act, and foreign aid agreements awarded by USAID.  Those actions, while disruptive, have been limited to certain agreement types or agencies. Continue Reading Executive Order Directs Systematic Review of “Covered Contracts and Grants” For Possible Termination

On February 24, Judge Armando Bonilla of the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) declined to dismiss a challenge to a $648 million award under a Missile Defense Agency (MDA) development deal, finding that the court had jurisdiction to review Other Transaction (OT) Authorities like the one at issue. For years, unsuccessful offerors have found it difficult to challenge OT award (OTA) decisions because both the GAO and COFC have found they have limited jurisdiction over these types of agreements.Continue Reading COFC Decision Significantly Broadens OTA Bid Protest Jurisdiction

On February 15, the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) announced two new “class deviations” (CDs) making a number of changes to the procurement rules applicable to GSA solicitations and contracts, including leases of real property. Continue Reading GSA Issues FAR Class Deviations Implementing DEI Requirements

On January 21, in MVL, Inc., et al. v. United States, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC) struck down a 2022 Executive Order (EO), as well as the implementing Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), signed by then-President Biden that required government contractors to enter Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) in order to compete on federal construction projects valued at over $35 million.Continue Reading Project Labor Agreements No Longer Mandated for Large Federal Construction Contracts

On January 8, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) sustained a pre-award bid protest filed by Bass, Berry & Sims PLC (Bass Berry), which challenged the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers’ (FLETC or the Agency) determination to exclude the protester, UNICA-BPA JV, LLC (UNICA), from a competition when UNICA had an active SAM registration at the time of final proposal revision (FPR), but not at the time of its initial proposal submission. The decision clarifies that FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management applies to the proposal that would bind the offeror to perform the resultant contract.Continue Reading Bid Protest Minute: GAO Decision Clarifies SAM Registration Rule

On September 10, the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) issued an opinion in Zolon PCS II, LLC v. United States, holding that the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA or Agency) unreasonably issued a deviation from FAR 52.204-7, which requires offerors to be continuously registered in SAM.gov from the time of proposal submission through award. Continue Reading Bid Protest Minute: COFC Makes It Clear; SAM Registration Can Sink a Proposal