On March 25, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced an $8.1 million settlement in a civil case under the False Claims Act (FCA) related to alleged customs evasion by a California importer of wood flooring. The private whistleblower who reported the conduct received over $1.2 million in the matter. As we suggested in a blog post in February, these sorts of enforcement actions will proliferate under the Trump DOJ.
Continue Reading DOJ Settlement Highlights Customs, FCA Risks for ImportersTrump Administration Revises SBA’s Small Business Goals
On January 24, the SBA announced updated small business contracting goals for fiscal year 2025, significantly decreasing some goals and standardizing targets across federal agencies. These changes bring the small business targets more closely in line with historic targets.
Continue Reading Trump Administration Revises SBA’s Small Business GoalsSmall Business Size Protest Minute: The Ostensible Subcontractor Exception that (Almost) Swallowed the Rule
As many of our readers know, the ostensible subcontractor rule is one way in which the Small Business Administration (SBA) can find affiliation between a small business and one of its subcontractors, potentially resulting in the small business’s disqualification from a procurement. The rule is designed to ensure that small businesses perform the primary and vital requirements of a set-aside contract and are not unduly reliant on an entity that is not similarly situated to perform the contract. Allegations of affiliation based on this doctrine are frequently made in size protests, putting at risk awards that small businesses have expended significant time and resources to secure.
Continue Reading Small Business Size Protest Minute: The Ostensible Subcontractor Exception that (Almost) Swallowed the RuleSBA’s OHA Finds Initial Offer To Be Of Consequence, Not Final Proposal Revision, for the “180-Day Rule”
On February 19, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) denied an appeal from an unsuccessful bidder who argued the awardee was large due to an acquisition that occurred while the award was pending. OHA found that Small Business Administration (SBA) regulations prohibit awards to concerns where a merger or acquisition occurs, resulting in the new business becoming “large,” within 180 days of the initial offer rather than a final proposal revision. This understanding follows the general rule that SBA determines a concern’s size as of the date of the initial offer. We explore the decision and its implications below.
Continue Reading SBA’s OHA Finds Initial Offer To Be Of Consequence, Not Final Proposal Revision, for the “180-Day Rule”Fourth Circuit Terminates Maryland District Court’s DEI Injunction
On March 14, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted the government’s motion for a stay pending appeal, terminating a Maryland district court’s injunction of certain elements of President Trump’s January 20 and 21 diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) executive orders (EO), “Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing” and “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity.” We wrote about the district court’s injunction here and here.
Continue Reading Fourth Circuit Terminates Maryland District Court’s DEI InjunctionBid Protest Minute: Bidder’s Responsibility to Submit Well-Drafted Proposal
On February 26, GAO denied the protest of Mission Analytics, Inc., challenging the award of a small business set-aside contract to ThunderCat Technology, LLC, explaining that “it is a firm’s responsibility to submit a well-written quotation.” The protest underscores the fact that proposals lacking sufficient detail and the requested information may be deemed technically unacceptable and ineligible for award. It is crucial that companies carefully review proposals before submission to ensure they cover all the requirements of an RFQ.
Continue Reading Bid Protest Minute: Bidder’s Responsibility to Submit Well-Drafted ProposalDepartment of Defense Issues Affirmative Action Class Deviation
Following U.S. General Services Administration’s (GSA) lead, which we wrote about here, on March 4, the Department of Defense (DoD) issued a Class Deviation—Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity in Federal Contracts—directing DoD Contracting Officers (COs) to “remove, replace, and not enforce Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) solicitation provisions and contract clauses associated with Executive Order (EO) 11246, Equal Employment Opportunity.”
Continue Reading Department of Defense Issues Affirmative Action Class DeviationEthics Rules Applicable to Hiring Former Federal Government Employees
As the Trump administration continues to eliminate federal positions and reduce contract and grant outlays, many private companies will likely be eyeing current and former government employees for employment over the coming months. However, companies looking to hire former government employees must keep in mind the strict and nuanced rules that govern their hiring, and, in some cases, prohibit contractors from paying former government employees and limit their ability to appear before their former agencies.
Continue Reading Ethics Rules Applicable to Hiring Former Federal Government EmployeesExecutive Order on Federal Contracting Transparency: Potential Challenges and Implications
A new executive order is set to reshape federal contracting by implementing more stringent transparency measures, but it may also create significant challenges for both government agencies and contractors.
Continue Reading Executive Order on Federal Contracting Transparency: Potential Challenges and ImplicationsJudge Denies Government’s Motion to Stay Injunction of Anti-DEI Executive Orders
On March 3 Judge Abelson of the U.S. District Court for the District or Maryland denied the government’s motion for a stay pending appeal of the preliminary injunction halting the termination of equity-related federal grants and contracts and stopping the imposition of new diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)-related certification requirements in federal agreements, among other actions required by President Trump’s DEI-related Executive Orders 14151 and 14173.
Continue Reading Judge Denies Government’s Motion to Stay Injunction of Anti-DEI Executive Orders